![]() In The Divider, Peter Baker and Susan Glasser write that Milley believed that Trump was “shameful,” and “complicit” in the January 6 attack. ![]() In interviews, he would say that it is not the place of the nation’s flag officers to discuss the performance of the nation’s civilian leaders.īut his views emerged in a number of books published after Trump left office, written by authors who had spoken with Milley, and many other civilian and military officials, on background. Milley was careful to refrain from commenting publicly on Trump’s cognitive unfitness and moral derangement. That this assumption did not hold true during the Trump administration presented a “unique challenge” for Milley, Dubik said. “For more than 200 years, the assumption in this country was that we would have a stable person as president,” one of Milley’s mentors, the retired three-star general James Dubik, told me. But the first 16 months of Milley’s term, a period that ended when Joe Biden succeeded Donald Trump as president, were not normal, because Trump was exceptionally unfit to serve. In normal times, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the principal military adviser to the president, is supposed to focus his attention on America’s national-security challenges, and on the readiness and lethality of its armed forces. A little more than two months had passed since the January 6 attack on the Capitol, and America’s nuclear arsenal was on Milley’s mind. These nuclear weapons are under the control of the 91st Missile Wing of the Air Force Global Strike Command, and it was to the 91st-the “Rough Riders”-that General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, paid a visit in March 2021. Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read. For these calculations, see the demonstration video starting at minute 7:58. Silos that have been filled, fed from, but not emptied, and then filled again, can use.See the demonstration video explaining these calculations, starting at minute 3:55.Convert to grain equivalents using FSA conversion factors:.Convert tons DM to 65% moisture by dividing by 0.35 = 104/0.35 = 297 tons of wet silage.Scroll down, the tool reports 137 tons dry matter (DM) for the filled silo and 33 tons DM removed for a top unloading silo, leaving 137 – 33 = 104 tons DM inventory on January 15, 2020.Enter 20 ft diameter, a filled height of 55 ft and a height of feed left in silo of 35 ft.On January 15, 2020, the top 20 ft had been removed, so the silo had 35 ft remaining. Corn silage is 7.94 bu/ton (at 65% moisture) and 4.08 bu/ton (at 65% moisture) for oatlage.Įxample: Determine the tons of wet silage for a 20 ft X 60 ft silo filled to a settled depth of 55’. Step 4: Multiply by the FSA conversion factor. Step 3: Divide by 0.35 to convert silage tons of dry matter to standard 65% moisture. Step 2: Scroll down to the bottom of the sheet where it gives the estimated the tons of silage remaining as tons of dry matter (DM) for either a top loading or bottom loading silo. Step 1: In the yellow cells, enter the silo diameter, the filled height, and the height of feed left on January 15 (other values can be left at default levels). This tool helps a farmer calculate the tons of silage in an upright silo and convert it to its grain equivalent for including in 2019 production for determining CFAP payments.īegin by downloading the Tower Capacity Silo spreadsheet. Kevin Jarek, Liz Binversie, Bill Halfman, Paul Mitchell
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |